Triple
T22737837
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Liepāja Lake |
E562322
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedNear |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | city of Liepāja |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: city of Liepāja | Statement: [Liepāja Lake, locatedNear, city of Liepāja]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: city of Liepāja Context triple: [Liepāja Lake, locatedNear, city of Liepāja]
-
A.
Liepāja, Latvia
chosen
Liepāja is a major port city on Latvia’s Baltic Sea coast, known for its historic architecture, naval heritage, and cultural life.
-
B.
Valmiera
Valmiera is a historic city in northern Latvia, situated on the Gauja River and known today as a regional economic and cultural center in the Vidzeme region.
-
C.
Daugavpils
Daugavpils is Latvia’s second-largest city, known as the birthplace of abstract expressionist painter Mark Rothko and for its multicultural heritage and 19th-century fortress.
-
D.
Riga Municipality
Riga Municipality is the local government area encompassing Latvia’s capital city, Riga, and its surrounding administrative territory.
-
E.
Jaunpils
Jaunpils is a small historic town in western Latvia known for its medieval castle and rural surroundings.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245513a5c81908d5cb471b4fc429d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f179707fd081909aed9b2f62b9f842 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:22 p.m.