Triple

T22730250
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Paris (1814) E562113 entity
Predicate coalitionStrength P149502 FINISHED
Object approximately 100000–120000 troops LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 100000–120000 troops | Statement: [Battle of Paris (1814), coalitionStrength, approximately 100000–120000 troops]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coalitionStrength
Context triple: [Battle of Paris (1814), coalitionStrength, approximately 100000–120000 troops]
  • A. coalitionLevel
    Indicates the degree or intensity of cooperative alignment or partnership between entities within a coalition.
  • B. coalitionPotential
    Indicates the potential or likelihood that two or more entities can form a cooperative alliance or coalition.
  • C. strengthCoalition
    Indicates the degree to which a coalition is cohesive, influential, or capable of achieving its collective objectives.
  • D. coalitionLed
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary leader or organizer of a coalition composed of multiple entities.
  • E. coalitionType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of coalition relationship that exists between the involved entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24550859c81908727d91efc3a81b4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1792cb9cc8190a7c45032427bca1a completed April 29, 2026, 3:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69eed2a971c0819088af574e40c9343f completed April 27, 2026, 3:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69eeeb5681f88190821129ced752f190 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:21 p.m.