Triple
T22717795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Allegra |
E561779
|
entity |
| Predicate | absorptionDecreasedBy |
P9925
|
FINISHED |
| Object | grapefruit juice |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: grapefruit juice | Statement: [Allegra, absorptionDecreasedBy, grapefruit juice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: absorptionDecreasedBy Context triple: [Allegra, absorptionDecreasedBy, grapefruit juice]
-
A.
absorbed
Indicates that one entity takes in, soaks up, or assimilates another entity or substance.
-
B.
decreedBy
Indicates that something (such as a rule, decision, or order) has been formally established or mandated by a particular authority or decision-making entity.
-
C.
declineIn
Indicates a relationship where one entity experiences a decrease or reduction in the level, amount, or intensity of another entity over time.
-
D.
isAttenuated
Indicates that the strength, intensity, or effect of something has been reduced or weakened relative to a prior or normal state.
-
E.
reduces
chosen
Indicates that one entity causes a decrease in the amount, intensity, degree, or impact of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454fc984819088213b58ee87a002 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1790ecbc48190926d16b20b674dbd |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62bd657c81909f7b01245b080a5f |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:19 p.m.