Triple
T22715248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Becket Fund for Religious Liberty |
E561710
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania | Statement: [Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, notableCase, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania Context triple: [Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, notableCase, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania]
-
A.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
B.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
C.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
-
D.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
-
E.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania Target entity description: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which a Catholic religious order challenged federal contraceptive coverage mandates on religious liberty grounds.
-
A.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
B.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
C.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
-
D.
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
-
E.
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454f1348819088d83f420925a5c1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1790ca59881909064d49f331fb711 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:18 p.m.