Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | Statement: [Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, notableCase, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.]

Target entity: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Context triple: [Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, notableCase, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.]

• A. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. chosen
  Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
• B. Zubik v. Burwell
  Zubik v. Burwell is a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning religious nonprofits’ objections to the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and the accommodation process for opting out.
• C. Hollingsworth v. Perry
  Hollingsworth v. Perry was a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that effectively restored same-sex marriage in California by dismissing an appeal over Proposition 8 for lack of standing.
• D. King v. Burwell
  King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
• E. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.