Triple

T22709245
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject court-martial at Fort Meade E561549 entity
Predicate verdictOnAidingTheEnemy P149407 FINISHED
Object not guilty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not guilty | Statement: [court-martial at Fort Meade, verdictOnAidingTheEnemy, not guilty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: verdictOnAidingTheEnemy
Context triple: [court-martial at Fort Meade, verdictOnAidingTheEnemy, not guilty]
  • A. belligerentSupport
    Indicates support given to a party engaged in conflict or hostilities, often implying backing one side in a belligerent or warlike context.
  • B. allegedBelligerent
    Indicates that one entity is claimed or accused of being a hostile or warring party in relation to another entity or conflict.
  • C. attitudeTowardEnemy
    Indicates the stance, feelings, or disposition that one entity holds toward an opposing or hostile entity.
  • D. aidedOpponent
    Indicates that one entity provided help or support to another entity who is considered an opponent or adversary.
  • E. supportedDuringWar
    Indicates that one entity provided assistance, resources, or backing to another entity specifically during a time of war.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2454f1348819088d83f420925a5c1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f178d1e24881909ebd4531c0daef7f completed April 29, 2026, 3:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee62bd657c81909f7b01245b080a5f completed April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ee8843d3308190b6e22bb98ae5c3d8 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:17 p.m.