Triple
T22688328
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Service and System Aspects Working Group 6 |
E560978
|
entity |
| Predicate | shortName |
P43
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SA6 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SA6 | Statement: [Service and System Aspects Working Group 6, shortName, SA6]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: SA6 Context triple: [Service and System Aspects Working Group 6, shortName, SA6]
-
A.
SA6
chosen
SA6 is a 3GPP working group responsible for standardizing mission-critical and application-layer services in mobile communication systems.
-
B.
SA5
SA5 is the 3GPP Service and System Aspects working group responsible for management, orchestration, and operations of mobile communication networks.
-
C.
SA3
SA3 is the 3GPP security working group responsible for specifying and evolving security architecture and mechanisms across mobile communication standards.
-
D.
SA2
SA2 is a 3GPP working group responsible for defining the overall system architecture and functional specifications of mobile communication networks.
-
E.
SA4
SA4 is a 3GPP working group responsible for the standardization of multimedia codecs, systems, and services in mobile communications.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454d71b48190a1f80af9f82b6fcf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f178983fc8819080aa00e45ff77952 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:13 p.m.