Triple
T22685779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hustad parish |
E560908
|
entity |
| Predicate | region |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Trøndelag |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Trøndelag | Statement: [Hustad parish, region, Trøndelag]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trøndelag Context triple: [Hustad parish, region, Trøndelag]
-
A.
Trøndelag
chosen
Trøndelag is a central region of Norway known for its historic city of Trondheim, coastal landscapes, and strong cultural traditions.
-
B.
Buskerud
Buskerud is a former county in southeastern Norway known for its varied landscape of forests, rivers, and mountains, including parts of the Hallingdal valley and Hardangervidda plateau.
-
C.
Møre og Romsdal
Møre og Romsdal is a coastal county in western Norway known for its dramatic fjords, islands, and mountainous landscapes.
-
D.
Nord-Valdres
Nord-Valdres is the northern part of the traditional Valdres district in Innlandet county, Norway, known for its mountainous landscapes, valleys, and rural communities.
-
E.
Hedmarken
Hedmarken is a traditional district in Innlandet county in eastern Norway, known for its agricultural landscapes and its central town, Hamar.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454d71b48190a1f80af9f82b6fcf |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f178637bc08190a8dfb33b5f4249e5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:12 p.m.