Triple

T22675360
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject rule of reason E560329 entity
Predicate originatedInCase P13656 FINISHED
Object Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States | Statement: [rule of reason, originatedInCase, Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
Context triple: [rule of reason, originatedInCase, Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States]
  • A. antitrust case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States chosen
    The antitrust case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States was a landmark 1911 U.S. Supreme Court decision that broke up John D. Rockefeller’s oil monopoly under the Sherman Antitrust Act, reshaping American corporate and competition law.
  • B. Northern Securities Co. v. United States
    Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
  • C. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
    United States v. E. C. Knight Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the federal government’s power to regulate monopolies under the Commerce Clause, weakening early enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
  • D. Pennzoil v. Texaco lawsuit
    The Pennzoil v. Texaco lawsuit was a landmark 1980s U.S. civil case in which Pennzoil won a multibillion-dollar judgment against Texaco over interference with its agreement to acquire Getty Oil, reshaping corporate merger practices and tort law.
  • E. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association
    United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association was an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held railroad rate-fixing agreements violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, even if the rates were reasonable.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2454bfd00819099115715a22cb057 completed April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f17823bd1881908958b0a8ba59e199 completed April 29, 2026, 3:16 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:11 p.m.