Triple

T22666614
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poisson process E559807 entity
Predicate hasStationaryIncrements P149162 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Poisson process, hasStationaryIncrements, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStationaryIncrements
Context triple: [Poisson process, hasStationaryIncrements, true]
  • A. hasStationaryMean
    Indicates that the associated process or variable has a mean value that does not change over time.
  • B. hasStationFunction
    Indicates that an entity serves in a particular functional role or capacity at a station.
  • C. hasIncrement
    Indicates that one value or state increases by a specified step or amount relative to another.
  • D. hasAutocorrelationFunction
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific autocorrelation function describing how its values correlate with themselves over different time lags.
  • E. hasMomentGeneratingFunction
    Indicates that a random variable or probability distribution possesses a well-defined moment generating function characterizing all of its moments.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2454a158c819093b8e35f5045efb6 completed April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1781c2c808190baf6964ca1eced6f completed April 29, 2026, 3:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee62a6245881909506ff502da14137 completed April 26, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ee8843d3308190b6e22bb98ae5c3d8 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:09 p.m.