Triple
T22634336
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ramanuja’s Vedantic corpus |
E558638
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesWork |
P2011
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sri Bhashya |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sri Bhashya | Statement: [Ramanuja’s Vedantic corpus, includesWork, Sri Bhashya]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sri Bhashya Context triple: [Ramanuja’s Vedantic corpus, includesWork, Sri Bhashya]
-
A.
Sri Bhashya
chosen
Sri Bhashya is Ramanujacharya’s authoritative Sanskrit commentary on the Brahma Sutras, foundational to the Vishishtadvaita school of Vedanta philosophy.
-
B.
Bhashya
Bhashya is a traditional Sanskrit commentary genre that provides detailed exegesis and philosophical interpretation of authoritative Hindu scriptures.
-
C.
Mahābhāṣya
Mahābhāṣya is Patañjali’s monumental and authoritative commentary on Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī, foundational to the classical Sanskrit grammatical tradition.
-
D.
Brahma Sutra Bhashya
Brahma Sutra Bhashya is Adi Shankaracharya’s influential commentary on the Brahma Sutras that systematically expounds the non-dualistic philosophy of Advaita Vedanta.
-
E.
Shabara Bhashya
Shabara Bhashya is an influential ancient Sanskrit commentary on the Purva Mimamsa Sutras, foundational to the Mimamsa school of Hindu philosophy and its theories of ritual and Vedic interpretation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245467d9881908d6985bd0db7a1f1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1700be10c8190830393fdbec1033d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:03 p.m.