Triple

T22626883
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject He Sapa E558443 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object United States Supreme Court case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) (as Black Hills) — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Supreme Court case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) (as Black Hills) | Statement: [He Sapa, subjectOf, United States Supreme Court case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) (as Black Hills)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States Supreme Court case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) (as Black Hills)
Context triple: [He Sapa, subjectOf, United States Supreme Court case United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980) (as Black Hills)]
  • A. United States Supreme Court decision United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians chosen
    United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal government had unlawfully taken the Black Hills from the Sioux, awarding monetary compensation for the violation of their treaty rights.
  • B. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
  • C. Ex parte Crow Dog
    Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.
  • D. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978)
    Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held tribal courts lack criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians, significantly limiting Native American sovereignty and self-governance in criminal matters.
  • E. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
    Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the inherent authority of Native American tribes to impose taxes on non-Indian entities conducting business on tribal lands.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245467d9881908d6985bd0db7a1f1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f16e3e09ec8190af940c25c7e8e029 completed April 29, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:01 p.m.