Triple
T22617894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | coat of arms of Ghana |
E558195
|
entity |
| Predicate | goldMineRepresents |
P148948
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mineral wealth |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mineral wealth | Statement: [coat of arms of Ghana, goldMineRepresents, mineral wealth]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: goldMineRepresents Context triple: [coat of arms of Ghana, goldMineRepresents, mineral wealth]
-
A.
goldDiscovered
Indicates that an instance of gold has been found or identified at a particular time, place, or context.
-
B.
minerRepresents
Indicates that a miner acts on behalf of, or serves as a representative or proxy for, another entity in a given context.
-
C.
mineName
Indicates that an entity has or is associated with a specific mine identified by a given name.
-
D.
miningSite
Indicates a location where mining activities or mineral extraction operations take place.
-
E.
discoveryOfOre
Indicates the event or relationship in which a particular ore deposit is found, identified, or recognized, typically linking the discoverer, the ore, and the location or time of discovery.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24545a8e08190bfa7482a2c725ff1 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f167ef7a148190870334af9c8b79a4 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee62855558819080da946c7b35a160 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ee8841e9cc81908d23b34215e3be71 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:59 p.m.