Triple

T22617498
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Masonry Pool E558186 entity
Predicate connectedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project | Statement: [Masonry Pool, connectedTo, Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project
Context triple: [Masonry Pool, connectedTo, Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project]
  • A. Escanaba Hydroelectric Project
    The Escanaba Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power facility on Michigan’s Escanaba River that generates electricity by harnessing the river’s flow.
  • B. Cushman Hydroelectric Project
    The Cushman Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power generation system in Washington State that uses Lake Cushman and associated dams and facilities to produce electricity.
  • C. Oak Grove Hydroelectric Project
    Oak Grove Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power facility in Oregon that generates electricity by harnessing the flow of the Oak Grove Fork of the Clackamas River.
  • D. Rock Creek–Cresta Hydroelectric Project
    The Rock Creek–Cresta Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power generation facility complex on California’s North Fork Feather River that produces electricity by harnessing the river’s flow through dams and powerhouses.
  • E. Donnells-Beardsley hydroelectric system
    The Donnells-Beardsley hydroelectric system is a hydroelectric power complex on California’s Stanislaus River that uses a series of dams, reservoirs, and powerhouses to generate electricity and support regional water management.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project
Target entity description: The Cedar Falls Hydroelectric Project is a historic hydroelectric power facility in Washington State that supplies electricity to the Seattle area and is associated with early 20th-century regional water and power development.
  • A. Escanaba Hydroelectric Project
    The Escanaba Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power facility on Michigan’s Escanaba River that generates electricity by harnessing the river’s flow.
  • B. Cushman Hydroelectric Project
    The Cushman Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power generation system in Washington State that uses Lake Cushman and associated dams and facilities to produce electricity.
  • C. Oak Grove Hydroelectric Project
    Oak Grove Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power facility in Oregon that generates electricity by harnessing the flow of the Oak Grove Fork of the Clackamas River.
  • D. Rock Creek–Cresta Hydroelectric Project
    The Rock Creek–Cresta Hydroelectric Project is a hydroelectric power generation facility complex on California’s North Fork Feather River that produces electricity by harnessing the river’s flow through dams and powerhouses.
  • E. Donnells-Beardsley hydroelectric system
    The Donnells-Beardsley hydroelectric system is a hydroelectric power complex on California’s Stanislaus River that uses a series of dams, reservoirs, and powerhouses to generate electricity and support regional water management.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24545a8e08190bfa7482a2c725ff1 completed April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f167ef7a148190870334af9c8b79a4 completed April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:59 p.m.