Triple
T2261436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mendoza Province |
E50047
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesIrrigationFrom |
P21624
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Andean snowmelt |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Andean snowmelt | Statement: [Mendoza Province, usesIrrigationFrom, Andean snowmelt]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesIrrigationFrom Context triple: [Mendoza Province, usesIrrigationFrom, Andean snowmelt]
-
A.
hasIrrigation
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or benefits from an irrigation system supplying water.
-
B.
hasIrrigationArea
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific area of land equipped or designated for irrigation.
-
C.
irrigates
Indicates that one entity supplies water to another, typically land or crops, for the purpose of supporting growth or maintaining moisture.
-
D.
waterUse
Indicates the amount or manner in which water is consumed, utilized, or withdrawn by an entity or activity.
-
E.
managesWaterFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for controlling, directing, or handling water originating from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b01e0048190ba96431b5f990ba9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc2ea65288190bc8644a07a11dfa9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb592588190ac1ef5e8c54575b1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.