Triple

T22608407
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Persian Motifs E566626 entity
Predicate hasPoeticCycleStructure P148912 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Persian Motifs, hasPoeticCycleStructure, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPoeticCycleStructure
Context triple: [Persian Motifs, hasPoeticCycleStructure, true]
  • A. poeticStructure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, embodies, or specifies the formal poetic organization (such as meter, rhyme scheme, or stanza pattern) used by another entity.
  • B. hasPoeticCycleTitle
    Indicates that a poetic work or cycle is associated with a specific title that designates that cycle as a whole.
  • C. hasRhymeSchemeFeature
    Indicates that a poetic work exhibits a specific characteristic or pattern related to its rhyme scheme.
  • D. rhymeScheme
    Indicates the pattern of end sounds in a sequence of lines, showing which lines rhyme with each other.
  • E. hasPoeticDevice
    Indicates that one entity (typically a text or passage) employs or contains a specific poetic device present in the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245884860819081046ce07d5872c4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f167e86794819097e9c1ea83db52e6 completed April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee627be4248190889a88764624e174 completed April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ee8841e9cc81908d23b34215e3be71 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:55 p.m.