Triple

T22605445
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cultural Heritage of North Macedonia E566542 entity
Predicate includesSite P5003 FINISHED
Object Stobi archaeological site NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stobi archaeological site | Statement: [Cultural Heritage of North Macedonia, includesSite, Stobi archaeological site]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stobi archaeological site
Context triple: [Cultural Heritage of North Macedonia, includesSite, Stobi archaeological site]
  • A. Nicopolis ad Istrum archaeological site
    Nicopolis ad Istrum archaeological site is the remains of a Roman and early Byzantine city in northern Bulgaria, notable for its well-preserved urban layout, public buildings, and inscriptions.
  • B. Ulpiana archaeological site
    The Ulpiana archaeological site is an ancient Roman and early Byzantine city in present-day Kosovo, notable for its well-preserved urban layout, fortifications, and Christian basilicas.
  • C. Apamea archaeological site
    Apamea archaeological site is an ancient Hellenistic and Roman city in western Syria, renowned for its extensive colonnaded street and well-preserved ruins.
  • D. Glanum archaeological site
    Glanum archaeological site is an ancient Greco-Roman city in southern France known for its well-preserved ruins, including monumental arches, temples, and residential structures.
  • E. Vidy Roman archaeological site
    The Vidy Roman archaeological site is an ancient Roman settlement area near Lausanne, Switzerland, featuring remains such as building foundations, roads, and artifacts that illustrate the region’s Roman-era urban life.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stobi archaeological site
Target entity description: The Stobi archaeological site is an ancient city in central North Macedonia, notable for its well-preserved Roman and early Christian remains, including mosaics, basilicas, and public buildings.
  • A. Nicopolis ad Istrum archaeological site
    Nicopolis ad Istrum archaeological site is the remains of a Roman and early Byzantine city in northern Bulgaria, notable for its well-preserved urban layout, public buildings, and inscriptions.
  • B. Ulpiana archaeological site
    The Ulpiana archaeological site is an ancient Roman and early Byzantine city in present-day Kosovo, notable for its well-preserved urban layout, fortifications, and Christian basilicas.
  • C. Apamea archaeological site
    Apamea archaeological site is an ancient Hellenistic and Roman city in western Syria, renowned for its extensive colonnaded street and well-preserved ruins.
  • D. Glanum archaeological site
    Glanum archaeological site is an ancient Greco-Roman city in southern France known for its well-preserved ruins, including monumental arches, temples, and residential structures.
  • E. Vidy Roman archaeological site
    The Vidy Roman archaeological site is an ancient Roman settlement area near Lausanne, Switzerland, featuring remains such as building foundations, roads, and artifacts that illustrate the region’s Roman-era urban life.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245884860819081046ce07d5872c4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f162709d808190af83837104a190f9 completed April 29, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:53 p.m.