Triple

T22604631
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Code Division Multiple Access E566521 entity
Predicate multipleAccessComparison P116109 FINISHED
Object alternative to TDMA LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alternative to TDMA | Statement: [Code Division Multiple Access, multipleAccessComparison, alternative to TDMA]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: multipleAccessComparison
Context triple: [Code Division Multiple Access, multipleAccessComparison, alternative to TDMA]
  • A. multipleAccess
    Indicates that an entity can be accessed or used by more than one agent, user, or process, either simultaneously or sequentially.
  • B. accessComparedTo chosen
    Indicates how the level, ease, or quality of access to something compares between two entities or contexts.
  • C. hasComparison
    Indicates that one entity is being evaluated or contrasted relative to another entity based on some shared attribute or criterion.
  • D. canOperateInMultiple
    Indicates that an entity is capable of functioning or being used across more than one context, environment, or mode.
  • E. hasMultiple
    Indicates that an entity is associated with more than one instance or occurrence of another related entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245884860819081046ce07d5872c4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f162709d808190af83837104a190f9 completed April 29, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee627be4248190889a88764624e174 completed April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:52 p.m.