Triple
T22604596
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Code Division Multiple Access |
E566521
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multiple access technique |
C19811
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: multiple access technique Context triple: [Code Division Multiple Access, instanceOf, multiple access technique]
-
A.
media access control technique
chosen
A media access control technique is a method or protocol that governs how multiple devices share and coordinate access to a common communication medium to avoid collisions and ensure efficient data transmission.
-
B.
multi-carrier modulation technique
A multi-carrier modulation technique is a method of transmitting data by dividing it across multiple closely spaced subcarriers, each modulated with a portion of the data stream to improve spectral efficiency and robustness against channel impairments.
-
C.
frequency-hopping communication system
A frequency-hopping communication system is a wireless transmission method in which the carrier rapidly switches among multiple frequency channels according to a pseudorandom sequence shared by transmitter and receiver to enhance security and resistance to interference.
-
D.
radio access technology standard
A radio access technology standard is a defined set of technical specifications that governs how wireless devices connect to and communicate over a radio-based network interface.
-
E.
radio access technology feature
A radio access technology feature is a specific capability or enhancement within a wireless communication system’s radio interface that improves performance, efficiency, coverage, or user experience.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245884860819081046ce07d5872c4 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:52 p.m.