Triple
T22594503
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Navajo Nation court decisions |
E574637
|
entity |
| Predicate | developsLaw |
P109889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Navajo common law principles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Navajo common law principles | Statement: [Navajo Nation court decisions, developsLaw, Navajo common law principles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsLaw Context triple: [Navajo Nation court decisions, developsLaw, Navajo common law principles]
-
A.
legalDevelopment
chosen
Indicates the occurrence or progression of a change, action, or event within a legal context, such as new laws, rulings, or regulatory updates affecting legal status or practice.
-
B.
formulatesLaw
Indicates that an entity creates, drafts, or establishes a law or legal rule that governs others.
-
C.
legalReformer
Indicates that an entity works to change, improve, or modernize laws or legal systems.
-
D.
formulatesLawsAs
Indicates that one entity expresses or codifies laws, rules, or principles in the form or framework represented by another entity.
-
E.
lawJournal
Indicates a relationship where a work is published in, associated with, or appears within a specific law journal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245bc11308190b69d794d5d1e0bb6 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f16164d690819096f7c4efb6cedad9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee627be4248190889a88764624e174 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:49 p.m.