Triple
T2259330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 |
E49999
|
entity |
| Predicate | partiallyInvalidatedIn |
P14663
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bowsher v. Synar |
E250301
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bowsher v. Synar | Statement: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedIn, Bowsher v. Synar]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bowsher v. Synar Context triple: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedIn, Bowsher v. Synar]
-
A.
Bowsher v. Synar
chosen
Bowsher v. Synar is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited congressional control over executive functions by ruling that Congress could not retain removal power over an official charged with executing federal budget cuts.
-
B.
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
-
C.
United States v. Washington Post Co.
United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
-
D.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
-
E.
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partiallyInvalidatedIn Context triple: [Gramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, partiallyInvalidatedIn, Bowsher v. Synar]
-
A.
partiallyInvalidatedBy
chosen
Indicates that the validity or effect of something is reduced or weakened, but not completely nullified, by another action or entity.
-
B.
partiallyRevokedBy
Indicates that an existing grant, permission, or authorization has been revoked in part (but not entirely) by another action or decision.
-
C.
invalidated
Indicates that one entity has rendered another entity null, void, or no longer legally or logically effective.
-
D.
partiallyPreserved
Indicates that the referenced entity or object is only incompletely intact, with some parts missing, damaged, or lost while others remain.
-
E.
partiallyReauthorizedBy
Indicates that an existing authorization or approval has been renewed or extended only in part by another entity or action, rather than fully reauthorized.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b01e0048190ba96431b5f990ba9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc2ea65288190bc8644a07a11dfa9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:17 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae7f067f208190a399e2b1a83badd1 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 8:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbdb592588190ac1ef5e8c54575b1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:55 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:48 p.m.