Triple
T22593159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Red Leicester cheese |
E565001
|
entity |
| Predicate | textureDetail |
P96596
|
FINISHED |
| Object | slightly crumbly |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: slightly crumbly | Statement: [Red Leicester cheese, textureDetail, slightly crumbly]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: textureDetail Context triple: [Red Leicester cheese, textureDetail, slightly crumbly]
-
A.
texture
Indicates the surface quality or feel of an entity as perceived by touch or appearance, such as being smooth, rough, soft, or coarse.
-
B.
visualDetail
Indicates that one entity provides or specifies the visual characteristics, features, or appearance details of another entity.
-
C.
textureFeatures
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by specific surface or material texture properties described by the other entity.
-
D.
surfaceQuality
Indicates the condition or characteristics of an entity’s outer surface, such as its smoothness, roughness, or finish.
-
E.
typicalTexture
Indicates the usual or characteristic surface feel or consistency that is commonly associated with an entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245836014819091b91ed3074742a3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f16163cb248190b377b110d80a6730 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee627be4248190889a88764624e174 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:49 p.m.