Triple

T22587738
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dehonians E564845 entity
Predicate hasAdditionalVowOrPromise P7683 FINISHED
Object availability for the mission of the Church LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: availability for the mission of the Church | Statement: [Dehonians, hasAdditionalVowOrPromise, availability for the mission of the Church]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdditionalVowOrPromise
Context triple: [Dehonians, hasAdditionalVowOrPromise, availability for the mission of the Church]
  • A. fulfilledVow
    Indicates that an entity has carried out or honored a previously made vow or promise.
  • B. vowsTo
    Indicates a commitment or solemn promise made by one entity to another to perform, uphold, or refrain from specific actions.
  • C. additionalVow chosen
    Indicates that an entity makes or is associated with an extra or supplementary vow beyond an initial or primary vow.
  • D. hasTypeOfVows
    Indicates that one entity is characterized by or associated with a particular kind or category of vows.
  • E. hasVow
    Indicates that one entity has made or is bound by a formal vow or promise in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245836014819091b91ed3074742a3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1615de7d48190b1ca46c76a1e609c completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee627be4248190889a88764624e174 completed April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 2:46 p.m.