Triple
T22578563
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Blast |
E544494
|
entity |
| Predicate | isDiscussedAs |
P75843
|
FINISHED |
| Object | intense part of Train of Thought |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intense part of Train of Thought | Statement: [The Blast, isDiscussedAs, intense part of Train of Thought]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDiscussedAs Context triple: [The Blast, isDiscussedAs, intense part of Train of Thought]
-
A.
discussedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity is talked about, treated, or examined in terms of another entity, often as an example, case, or framing concept.
-
B.
discussed
Indicates that one entity talked about, examined, or debated a topic, issue, or other entity with someone else.
-
C.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
-
D.
containsDiscussionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or features a discussion, treatment, or consideration of another entity as a topic or subject.
-
E.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e30d05481909df915354c89f0d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15feee27c8190b31c923e1f00a363 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee626e6bb08190ada4dd8b48cc0c43 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:53 p.m.