Triple

T22567568
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. John W. Dean III E557991 entity
Predicate involvesCooperation P148762 FINISHED
Object cooperation with federal prosecutors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cooperation with federal prosecutors | Statement: [United States v. John W. Dean III, involvesCooperation, cooperation with federal prosecutors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: involvesCooperation
Context triple: [United States v. John W. Dean III, involvesCooperation, cooperation with federal prosecutors]
  • A. cooperationAmong
    Indicates a relationship in which multiple entities work together collaboratively toward shared goals or mutual benefit.
  • B. cooperateThrough
    Indicates that entities work together or coordinate their actions by means of a specific intermediary, method, or channel.
  • C. implementedInCooperationWith
    Indicates that an action, project, or initiative was carried out jointly or collaboratively together with another party.
  • D. cooperationAgainst
    Indicates a collaborative relationship in which two or more entities work together in opposition to a shared target or adversary.
  • E. cooperationType
    Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e5ae4ac8190b1f503457603d969 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15fabb9f081908c33c8e2ddf18047 completed April 29, 2026, 1:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee626e6bb08190ada4dd8b48cc0c43 completed April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ee8841e9cc81908d23b34215e3be71 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:52 p.m.