Triple
T22567567
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. John W. Dean III |
E557991
|
entity |
| Predicate | pleaTo |
P148761
|
FINISHED |
| Object | obstruction of justice |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: obstruction of justice | Statement: [United States v. John W. Dean III, pleaTo, obstruction of justice]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pleaTo Context triple: [United States v. John W. Dean III, pleaTo, obstruction of justice]
-
A.
plea
Indicates that a defendant formally states their response (such as guilty, not guilty, or no contest) to criminal charges in a legal proceeding.
-
B.
pleadsWith
Indicates that one entity urgently and emotionally appeals to another, often requesting help, mercy, or a favorable decision.
-
C.
petitionPresentedTo
Indicates that a formal petition has been submitted or delivered by one party to another party or authority for consideration or action.
-
D.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
E.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e5ae4ac8190b1f503457603d969 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15fabb9f081908c33c8e2ddf18047 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee626e6bb08190ada4dd8b48cc0c43 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ee8841e9cc81908d23b34215e3be71 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:52 p.m.