Triple
T22536977
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leslie West |
E557180
|
entity |
| Predicate | influentialStyle |
P112750
|
FINISHED |
| Object | heavy blues-rock guitar playing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: heavy blues-rock guitar playing | Statement: [Leslie West, influentialStyle, heavy blues-rock guitar playing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influentialStyle Context triple: [Leslie West, influentialStyle, heavy blues-rock guitar playing]
-
A.
influencedFashionTrend
Indicates that one entity caused or contributed to a change or direction in another entity’s fashion style or prevailing clothing trends.
-
B.
inTheStyleOf
Indicates that one entity is created, performed, or presented in a manner that imitates or closely resembles the characteristic style of another entity.
-
C.
personHasNotableStyle
chosen
Indicates that a person is recognized for having a distinctive or noteworthy style.
-
D.
fashionStyle
Indicates the characteristic way in which an entity dresses or presents themselves in terms of clothing and appearance.
-
E.
governsInStyle
Indicates that a governing entity exercises authority or leadership in a distinctive, notable, or characteristic manner.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e57483c8190b0887c4f8ff26446 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15edbd1ec81908ef26b9e442d1921 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e898c864148190a3f5feec7967d49c |
completed | April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:51 p.m.