Triple

T22523093
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Synod of Diamper E556828 entity
Predicate concernedTradition P148710 FINISHED
Object Chaldean Catholic tradition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chaldean Catholic tradition | Statement: [Synod of Diamper, concernedTradition, Chaldean Catholic tradition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concernedTradition
Context triple: [Synod of Diamper, concernedTradition, Chaldean Catholic tradition]
  • A. questionedTradition
    Indicates that an entity challenged, doubted, or critically examined an established custom, belief, or practice.
  • B. mainTradition
    Indicates that one entity represents the primary or dominant tradition associated with another entity.
  • C. continuedTraditionOf
    Indicates that one entity carries on, preserves, or perpetuates a tradition, practice, or custom that originated with another entity.
  • D. establishedTradition
    Indicates that something has become a customary, long-standing practice or convention that is regularly followed within a group, culture, or context.
  • E. hasFaithfulOfTradition
    Indicates that an entity has followers or adherents who remain loyal to and practice a particular tradition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e5657e881909f16ca58352c50da completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15e338dfc819082e1eeede3805fb9 completed April 29, 2026, 1:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ee625e3b408190a60c759fb0b28fe2 completed April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ee8841e9cc81908d23b34215e3be71 completed April 26, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:50 p.m.