Triple
T22515478
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sugar Loaf Dam |
E556634
|
entity |
| Predicate | projectAuthorization |
P144261
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962 | Statement: [Sugar Loaf Dam, projectAuthorization, Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962 Context triple: [Sugar Loaf Dam, projectAuthorization, Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962]
-
A.
Fryingpan–Arkansas Project
chosen
The Fryingpan–Arkansas Project is a major U.S. water diversion and storage system in Colorado that transfers water from the Western Slope to the Arkansas River Basin for irrigation, municipal use, and hydroelectric power.
-
B.
Colorado River Storage Project Act
The Colorado River Storage Project Act is a U.S. federal law that authorized a system of dams, reservoirs, and related works on the Colorado River and its tributaries to provide water storage, hydroelectric power, and river regulation in the Upper Basin states.
-
C.
Boulder Canyon Project Act
The Boulder Canyon Project Act is a 1928 U.S. federal law that authorized the construction of Hoover Dam and the All-American Canal, enabling large-scale water storage and hydroelectric power development on the Colorado River.
-
D.
Colorado River Basin Project Act
The Colorado River Basin Project Act is a 1968 U.S. federal law that authorized major water development projects in the Colorado River Basin, including the Central Arizona Project, to support water supply, irrigation, and regional growth in the American Southwest.
-
E.
Bonneville Project Act of 1937
The Bonneville Project Act of 1937 is a U.S. federal law that created the Bonneville Power Administration and established the framework for marketing and transmitting hydroelectric power from the Columbia River dams in the Pacific Northwest.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: projectAuthorization Context triple: [Sugar Loaf Dam, projectAuthorization, Fryingpan–Arkansas Project Act of 1962]
-
A.
authorizesProject
chosen
Indicates that one entity grants official permission or approval for another entity to initiate or carry out a project.
-
B.
authorizedProject
Indicates that a project has been formally approved or granted permission by the relevant authority to proceed or be used.
-
C.
canAuthorize
Indicates that one entity has the power or permission to grant approval or official permission for another entity to perform an action or access a resource.
-
D.
authorityGranted
Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
-
E.
officeGrantedFor
Indicates that an official position or role has been formally conferred upon an entity for a specified purpose, term, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e5657e881909f16ca58352c50da |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15e2cfc908190b3489228a1997f45 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ee625e3b408190a60c759fb0b28fe2 |
completed | April 26, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:50 p.m.