Triple
T22512710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Seven Labors of Esfandiyar |
E556560
|
entity |
| Predicate | chronologicallyBefore |
P6880
|
FINISHED |
| Object | battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam | Statement: [Seven Labors of Esfandiyar, chronologicallyBefore, battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam Context triple: [Seven Labors of Esfandiyar, chronologicallyBefore, battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam]
-
A.
Battle of Gulnabad
The Battle of Gulnabad (1722) was a decisive engagement in which Afghan forces defeated the Safavid Persians, leading directly to the fall of Isfahan and the collapse of Safavid rule in Iran.
-
B.
Battle of Dandanaqan
The Battle of Dandanaqan (1040) was a decisive military engagement in which the Seljuk Turks defeated the Ghaznavid Empire, leading to Seljuk dominance in Khorasan and the decline of Ghaznavid power.
-
C.
Battle of Nahavand
The Battle of Nahavand was a decisive 7th-century clash in which the Rashidun Caliphate effectively broke Sassanian power in Persia, paving the way for the Islamic conquest of Iran.
-
D.
Battle of Hormozdgan
The Battle of Hormozdgan was the decisive 224 CE confrontation in which Ardashir I defeated and killed the last Parthian king, Artabanus IV, leading to the foundation of the Sasanian Empire in Iran.
-
E.
Battle of Royan
The Battle of Royan was a late-World War II Allied operation in April 1945 to capture the German-held Atlantic port city of Royan in southwestern France.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam Target entity description: The battle of Esfandiyar and Rostam is a climactic confrontation in the Persian epic Shahnameh where the divinely favored prince Esfandiyar fatally clashes with the legendary hero Rostam, symbolizing the tragic conflict between duty and heroism.
-
A.
Battle of Gulnabad
The Battle of Gulnabad (1722) was a decisive engagement in which Afghan forces defeated the Safavid Persians, leading directly to the fall of Isfahan and the collapse of Safavid rule in Iran.
-
B.
Battle of Dandanaqan
The Battle of Dandanaqan (1040) was a decisive military engagement in which the Seljuk Turks defeated the Ghaznavid Empire, leading to Seljuk dominance in Khorasan and the decline of Ghaznavid power.
-
C.
Battle of Nahavand
The Battle of Nahavand was a decisive 7th-century clash in which the Rashidun Caliphate effectively broke Sassanian power in Persia, paving the way for the Islamic conquest of Iran.
-
D.
Battle of Hormozdgan
The Battle of Hormozdgan was the decisive 224 CE confrontation in which Ardashir I defeated and killed the last Parthian king, Artabanus IV, leading to the foundation of the Sasanian Empire in Iran.
-
E.
Battle of Royan
The Battle of Royan was a late-World War II Allied operation in April 1945 to capture the German-held Atlantic port city of Royan in southwestern France.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e555edc81909ca803587dafd747 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15d61a27881909faed490d2b65f39 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:50 p.m.