Triple
T22504132
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BBH |
E556344
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCreativeReputation |
P83300
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [BBH, hasCreativeReputation, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCreativeReputation Context triple: [BBH, hasCreativeReputation, high]
-
A.
haveReputation
Indicates that an entity is recognized or regarded in a certain way by others, reflecting its perceived character, quality, or status.
-
B.
hasCreativeBreakthroughReputation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is regarded as having a notable reputation for achieving creative breakthroughs or innovative advances.
-
C.
hasNotableReputation
Indicates that an entity is widely recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, or characteristic.
-
D.
hasCreativeWorkStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a creative work within its lifecycle (e.g., planned, in progress, completed, or published).
-
E.
hasCreativeScope
Indicates that one entity possesses authority or responsibility to make creative decisions or contributions within a defined domain or project.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e555edc81909ca803587dafd747 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15d5ac5808190a66f9111c350f4dc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e898be31448190be5ae7f5656f0497 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:50 p.m.