Triple

T22483596
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject G major E555827 entity
Predicate keySignatureAccidentals P125129 FINISHED
Object 1 sharp LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1 sharp | Statement: [G major, keySignatureAccidentals, 1 sharp]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keySignatureAccidentals
Context triple: [G major, keySignatureAccidentals, 1 sharp]
  • A. numberOfAccidentals chosen
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many accidentals (sharps, flats, or naturals) are associated with a given musical element.
  • B. musicalSymbol
    Indicates that one entity is a musical notation mark or sign associated with another entity in a musical context.
  • C. hasKeySignatureDistribution
    Indicates that there is a specific pattern or spread of key signatures associated with the entity, describing how frequently or prominently different key signatures occur.
  • D. hasKeySignature
    Indicates that one musical work, passage, or notation is associated with a specific key signature defining its set of sharps or flats.
  • E. musicTheoryContext
    Indicates that one entity is interpreted or analyzed within the framework, rules, or concepts of music theory in relation to another entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e53897c819088863779f8c50bb0 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15c3b03d881909e286a124c1a2b1c completed April 29, 2026, 1:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e898b6eee08190ba673a0ee329e671 completed April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:49 p.m.