Triple
T22480110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 3GPP TS 29.274 |
E555740
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesInterfaceProtocol |
P148363
|
FINISHED |
| Object | S3 interface |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: S3 interface | Statement: [3GPP TS 29.274, definesInterfaceProtocol, S3 interface]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesInterfaceProtocol Context triple: [3GPP TS 29.274, definesInterfaceProtocol, S3 interface]
-
A.
usesInterface
Indicates that one entity interacts with or operates another entity through a specified interface or set of interface methods.
-
B.
extendsInterface
Indicates that one interface is defined as a subtype of another interface, inheriting its contract and adding or refining its members.
-
C.
publicInterface
Indicates that an entity exposes a publicly accessible interface through which other entities can interact with it.
-
D.
hasInterface
Indicates that one entity provides, exposes, or is connected through a defined interface to another entity.
-
E.
coversInterface
Indicates that one entity provides or implements the functionality defined by a specified interface.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e53897c819088863779f8c50bb0 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15c3836a08190b6f0d88b94cb80a3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e898b6eee08190ba673a0ee329e671 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e8aa39e3388190b659d59948ebf3e6 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 11 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:49 p.m.