Triple
T22457645
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | HAZOP |
E555155
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hazard analysis technique |
C11960
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: hazard analysis technique Context triple: [HAZOP, instanceOf, hazard analysis technique]
-
A.
technique in analysis
A technique in analysis is a systematic method or procedure used to examine, simplify, or solve mathematical problems involving limits, continuity, differentiation, integration, or related structures.
-
B.
architecture analysis method
An architecture analysis method is a systematic approach used to evaluate and understand the structure, qualities, and trade-offs of a software or system architecture against its requirements and constraints.
-
C.
hazardous substance release response framework
A hazardous substance release response framework is a structured set of policies, procedures, roles, and communication protocols designed to guide the detection, assessment, containment, and remediation of accidental or intentional releases of dangerous materials.
-
D.
risk assessment process
chosen
The risk assessment process is a systematic procedure for identifying potential hazards, analyzing and evaluating their likelihood and impact, and determining appropriate measures to manage or mitigate those risks.
-
E.
hazardous waste regulatory framework
A hazardous waste regulatory framework is a structured set of laws, standards, and procedures that govern the generation, handling, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous wastes to protect human health and the environment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e51fdec8190adfdf9f8a6362221 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:48 p.m.