Triple

T22444636
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CJS E554833 entity
Predicate dependencyGraph P148224 FINISHED
Object resolved at runtime LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resolved at runtime | Statement: [CJS, dependencyGraph, resolved at runtime]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dependencyGraph
Context triple: [CJS, dependencyGraph, resolved at runtime]
  • A. dependencyModel
    Indicates a relationship where one entity relies on, is conditioned by, or is structured according to another entity within a dependency framework or model.
  • B. dependency
    Indicates that one entity relies on, is conditioned by, or cannot function or exist properly without another entity.
  • C. usesDigraph
    Indicates that one entity employs or represents information using a directed graph structure, where relationships have a specified direction.
  • D. crownDependencyOf
    Indicates that one entity is a Crown dependency that is self-governing but under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of another entity (typically a state or monarch).
  • E. graphAnalogue
    Indicates that one entity serves as a graph-theoretic counterpart or structural analogue of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e5113208190ab58c6b595f9d1d0 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15ae517208190924a7968723f55ef completed April 29, 2026, 1:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e898ad961c819098fd1e46129bddcc completed April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e8aa39e3388190b659d59948ebf3e6 completed April 22, 2026, 11 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.