Triple
T22428866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pagham |
E554441
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pagham electoral ward |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pagham electoral ward | Statement: [Pagham, partOf, Pagham electoral ward]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pagham electoral ward Context triple: [Pagham, partOf, Pagham electoral ward]
-
A.
Pagham
chosen
Pagham is a coastal village and parish in West Sussex, England, known for its shingle beach, nature reserve, and popular seaside holiday facilities.
-
B.
Henham
Henham is a small rural village located in the English county of Suffolk.
-
C.
Paglesham
Paglesham is a small rural village in Essex, England, known historically for its fishing, boatbuilding, and smuggling heritage along the River Roach.
-
D.
Bedhampton
Bedhampton is a suburban area and former village in Hampshire, England, situated near Havant on the south coast.
-
E.
Withyham
Withyham is a small rural village and civil parish in East Sussex, England, known for its historic church and scenic setting in the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4f2d0c819091aa3558ea2ee630 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15a30109481908724a0cf7596d105 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.