Triple
T22423463
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Erdős–Moser equation |
E554305
|
entity |
| Predicate | isRelatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem | Statement: [Erdős–Moser equation, isRelatedTo, Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem Context triple: [Erdős–Moser equation, isRelatedTo, Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem]
-
A.
Erdős–Moser equation
The Erdős–Moser equation is a famous unsolved Diophantine equation in number theory that asks whether 1^k + 2^k + ... + (m−1)^k = m^k has any integer solutions beyond the trivial case (k, m) = (1, 2).
-
B.
Waring's problem
Waring's problem is a famous conjecture in number theory that concerns representing natural numbers as sums of fixed powers of integers and determining how many such powers are needed.
-
C.
Fermat polygonal number theorem
The Fermat polygonal number theorem is a result in number theory stating that every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of polygonal numbers of a given order.
-
D.
Pillai’s conjecture
Pillai’s conjecture is an unproven statement in number theory asserting that the difference between perfect powers takes each positive integer value only finitely many times.
-
E.
Ramanujan–Nagell equation
The Ramanujan–Nagell equation is a famous Diophantine equation in number theory that has only finitely many integer solutions and is closely associated with the work of Srinivasa Ramanujan.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem Target entity description: The Prouhet–Tarry–Escott problem is a classic number theory problem that asks for distinct integer multisets whose powers up to a given degree have equal sums, making it a central example in the study of equal-sum power partitions and Diophantine equations.
-
A.
Erdős–Moser equation
The Erdős–Moser equation is a famous unsolved Diophantine equation in number theory that asks whether 1^k + 2^k + ... + (m−1)^k = m^k has any integer solutions beyond the trivial case (k, m) = (1, 2).
-
B.
Waring's problem
Waring's problem is a famous conjecture in number theory that concerns representing natural numbers as sums of fixed powers of integers and determining how many such powers are needed.
-
C.
Fermat polygonal number theorem
The Fermat polygonal number theorem is a result in number theory stating that every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of polygonal numbers of a given order.
-
D.
Pillai’s conjecture
Pillai’s conjecture is an unproven statement in number theory asserting that the difference between perfect powers takes each positive integer value only finitely many times.
-
E.
Ramanujan–Nagell equation
The Ramanujan–Nagell equation is a famous Diophantine equation in number theory that has only finitely many integer solutions and is closely associated with the work of Srinivasa Ramanujan.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4f2d0c819091aa3558ea2ee630 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15a2af620819083338127e78137dc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.