Triple

T22423421
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Erdős–Straus conjecture E554304 entity
Predicate variableConstraint P79479 FINISHED
Object x, y, z are positive integers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: x, y, z are positive integers | Statement: [Erdős–Straus conjecture, variableConstraint, x, y, z are positive integers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: variableConstraint
Context triple: [Erdős–Straus conjecture, variableConstraint, x, y, z are positive integers]
  • A. elementTypeConstraint
    Indicates that there is a restriction or rule specifying which types of elements are allowed or required in a given context.
  • B. constrainedBy
    Indicates that one entity’s state, behavior, or possibilities are limited, restricted, or governed by another entity.
  • C. variableCondition chosen
    Indicates that a variable is subject to a specific state, constraint, or requirement that must hold for a given context or operation.
  • D. variableType
    Indicates that one entity is the type or data category of the other entity, which is a variable.
  • E. constraintLanguage
    Indicates that a specific formal language or syntax is used to express or define a constraint.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4f2d0c819091aa3558ea2ee630 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15a2af620819083338127e78137dc completed April 29, 2026, 1:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e898a327948190beee5e168006a0a7 completed April 22, 2026, 9:45 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.