Triple
T22423280
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Erdős distinct distances problem |
E554301
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalLowerBound |
P140216
|
FINISHED |
| Object | c·n^{1/2} |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: c·n^{1/2} | Statement: [Erdős distinct distances problem, originalLowerBound, c·n^{1/2}]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalLowerBound
Context triple: [Erdős distinct distances problem, originalLowerBound, c·n^{1/2}]
-
A.
lowerLimit
Indicates that one value serves as the minimum or smallest allowable bound or threshold for another value or range.
-
B.
lowerBoundaryLocation
Indicates the place or region where the lower or bottom boundary of something is situated.
-
C.
lowerBoundGrowth
chosen
Indicates that one quantity grows at least as fast as another, establishing a minimum rate or bound on its growth relative to that reference.
-
D.
hasLowerBoundaryDefinedBy
Indicates that one entity’s lower limit, edge, or boundary is specified or determined by another entity.
-
E.
knownLowerBoundProvedBy
Indicates that a specific lower bound has been formally established or proven by a particular method, proof, or source.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4f2d0c819091aa3558ea2ee630 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15a2af620819083338127e78137dc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e8989495bc81909d2699fce5992e28 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:47 p.m.