Triple

T22417135
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Count of Läckö E554150 entity
Predicate associatedDynasty P1547 FINISHED
Object De la Gardie NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: De la Gardie | Statement: [Count of Läckö, associatedDynasty, De la Gardie]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: De la Gardie
Context triple: [Count of Läckö, associatedDynasty, De la Gardie]
  • A. De la Gardie chosen
    De la Gardie is a prominent Swedish noble family historically influential in the country’s political and cultural life.
  • B. Jacob De la Gardie
    Jacob De la Gardie was a prominent early 17th-century Swedish statesman and military commander who played a key role in Sweden’s expansion as a great power.
  • C. Axel Julius De la Gardie
    Axel Julius De la Gardie was a Swedish nobleman and military officer from the influential De la Gardie family who held high commands in the late 17th and early 18th centuries.
  • D. Pontus Fredrik De la Gardie
    Pontus Fredrik De la Gardie was a Swedish nobleman and military officer from the influential De la Gardie family of the 17th century.
  • E. Magnus Stenbock
    Magnus Stenbock was a prominent Swedish field marshal and nobleman renowned for his military leadership during the Great Northern War.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4e6ce8819085a1e06d886bf21c completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15946cd2c8190bdec0348de6ebcb9 completed April 29, 2026, 1:05 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:46 p.m.