Triple
T22416794
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minister for Justice of Sweden |
E554142
|
entity |
| Predicate | oversees |
P46
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Swedish National Courts Administration |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Swedish National Courts Administration | Statement: [Minister for Justice of Sweden, oversees, Swedish National Courts Administration]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Swedish National Courts Administration Context triple: [Minister for Justice of Sweden, oversees, Swedish National Courts Administration]
-
A.
Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
The Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden is the highest court in the country for cases involving administrative law and disputes between individuals and public authorities.
-
B.
Courts of Appeal of Sweden
The Courts of Appeal of Sweden are intermediate appellate courts that review decisions from district courts and serve as the final instance in most cases not taken up by the Supreme Court.
-
C.
Supreme Court of Sweden
The Supreme Court of Sweden is the highest judicial authority in Sweden for civil and criminal cases, serving as the final court of appeal and guiding the development of Swedish case law.
-
D.
administrative courts of appeal of Sweden
The administrative courts of appeal of Sweden are intermediate-level courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, migration, and other public law disputes.
-
E.
Judiciary of Sweden
The Judiciary of Sweden is the independent system of courts and legal institutions responsible for interpreting and applying Swedish law, ensuring justice, and safeguarding the rule of law in the country.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Swedish National Courts Administration Target entity description: The Swedish National Courts Administration is the central government agency responsible for managing and supporting Sweden’s court system, including its administration, budgeting, and development.
-
A.
Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
The Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden is the highest court in the country for cases involving administrative law and disputes between individuals and public authorities.
-
B.
Courts of Appeal of Sweden
The Courts of Appeal of Sweden are intermediate appellate courts that review decisions from district courts and serve as the final instance in most cases not taken up by the Supreme Court.
-
C.
Supreme Court of Sweden
The Supreme Court of Sweden is the highest judicial authority in Sweden for civil and criminal cases, serving as the final court of appeal and guiding the development of Swedish case law.
-
D.
administrative courts of appeal of Sweden
The administrative courts of appeal of Sweden are intermediate-level courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, migration, and other public law disputes.
-
E.
Judiciary of Sweden
The Judiciary of Sweden is the independent system of courts and legal institutions responsible for interpreting and applying Swedish law, ensuring justice, and safeguarding the rule of law in the country.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4e6ce8819085a1e06d886bf21c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15946cd2c8190bdec0348de6ebcb9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:46 p.m.