Triple
T22405685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | canton of Apt |
E553875
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bonnieux |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bonnieux | Statement: [canton of Apt, contains, Bonnieux]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bonnieux Context triple: [canton of Apt, contains, Bonnieux]
-
A.
Bonnieux
chosen
Bonnieux is a picturesque hilltop village in southeastern France’s Provence region, known for its historic stone houses, terraced streets, and panoramic views over the Luberon valley.
-
B.
Bédarrides
Bédarrides is a commune in southeastern France’s Vaucluse department, known for its location at the confluence of the Ouvèze and Sorgue rivers and its historical ties to the former Papal territory of Comtat Venaissin.
-
C.
Cuers
Cuers is a commune in the Var department of southeastern France, situated inland from Toulon in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region.
-
D.
Seysses
Seysses is a commune in southwestern France, located in the Haute-Garonne department near Toulouse.
-
E.
Draguignan
Draguignan is a town in southeastern France’s Var department, known as a former prefecture and gateway to the Provence region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4da7048190b4387d422a9a0de5 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f158b739b88190a7f1f20fd1e9b188 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:46 p.m.