Triple

T22400749
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Abell 262 E553750 entity
Predicate hasXRayLuminosity P135127 FINISHED
Object low X-ray luminosity compared to rich clusters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: low X-ray luminosity compared to rich clusters | Statement: [Abell 262, hasXRayLuminosity, low X-ray luminosity compared to rich clusters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasXRayLuminosity
Context triple: [Abell 262, hasXRayLuminosity, low X-ray luminosity compared to rich clusters]
  • A. XRayLuminosity chosen
    Indicates the amount of energy an object emits in the form of X-ray radiation.
  • B. hasXRaySources
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with one or more X-ray emitting sources.
  • C. hasLowLuminosity
    Indicates that an entity emits relatively little light or energy compared to a typical or reference level.
  • D. hasMaserEmission
    Indicates that an object exhibits detectable maser (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) emission.
  • E. hasStellarSpectrum
    Indicates that an astronomical object exhibits a particular stellar spectrum characterizing its emitted light across wavelengths.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4da7048190b4387d422a9a0de5 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f158b39c908190a735aa860d733869 completed April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e8989495bc81909d2699fce5992e28 completed April 22, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:46 p.m.