Triple
T22400697
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Perseus Cluster |
E553749
|
entity |
| Predicate | dominantGalaxyType |
P148007
|
FINISHED |
| Object | elliptical galaxies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elliptical galaxies | Statement: [Perseus Cluster, dominantGalaxyType, elliptical galaxies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantGalaxyType Context triple: [Perseus Cluster, dominantGalaxyType, elliptical galaxies]
-
A.
dominantGalaxy
Indicates that one galaxy exerts a dominant influence or control over another galaxy, such as through gravitational effects or hierarchical structure within a system.
-
B.
hasGalaxyType
Indicates that a galaxy is classified as belonging to a specific morphological or structural type.
-
C.
dominantSpectralType
Indicates the primary or most prevalent spectral type characterizing the electromagnetic emission of an object or region.
-
D.
hasCentralGalaxy
Indicates that a galaxy cluster or group possesses a specific galaxy that occupies the central, dominant position within it.
-
E.
isDwarfGalaxy
Indicates that the subject galaxy is classified as a dwarf galaxy, typically much smaller and less luminous than standard galaxies.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4da7048190b4387d422a9a0de5 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f158b39c908190a735aa860d733869 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e8989495bc81909d2699fce5992e28 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 9:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e8aa39e3388190b659d59948ebf3e6 |
completed | April 22, 2026, 11 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:46 p.m.