Triple

T22388535
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Albert M. Kligman E553456 entity
Predicate ethicsControversy P16556 FINISHED
Object lack of informed consent in prison experiments LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lack of informed consent in prison experiments | Statement: [Albert M. Kligman, ethicsControversy, lack of informed consent in prison experiments]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicsControversy
Context triple: [Albert M. Kligman, ethicsControversy, lack of informed consent in prison experiments]
  • A. ethicalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
  • B. legalAndEthicalDebate chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an issue, action, or decision is the subject of ongoing discussion and disagreement concerning both its legality and its ethical acceptability.
  • C. functionInEthics
    Indicates that something serves a particular role, purpose, or contribution within the domain of ethics or ethical theory.
  • D. viewsEthicsAs
    Indicates how one entity regards, interprets, or conceptualizes the nature, role, or importance of ethics.
  • E. ethicalConnotation
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a positive, negative, or otherwise specific moral or ethical evaluation in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4cf87c8190a1ff474daec326b7 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f15858c13c819098fe66a50ecea7d7 completed April 29, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e73015484c8190a9a0b9f554b61a81 completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:45 p.m.