Triple
T22383795
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carl Djerassi |
E553340
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cantor’s Dilemma |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantor’s Dilemma | Statement: [Carl Djerassi, notableWork, Cantor’s Dilemma]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantor’s Dilemma Context triple: [Carl Djerassi, notableWork, Cantor’s Dilemma]
-
A.
Cantor’s paradox
Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
-
B.
Satan, Cantor, and Infinity
"Satan, Cantor, and Infinity" is a popular logic and mathematics book by Raymond Smullyan that presents puzzles and paradoxes through playful dialogues and stories.
-
C.
Paradoxes of the Infinite
Paradoxes of the Infinite is a foundational 19th-century work in the philosophy of mathematics that systematically explores the nature of infinity and anticipates key ideas of modern set theory.
-
D.
Cantor’s theorem
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
-
E.
Russell’s paradox
Russell’s paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in naive set theory that reveals problems with sets that contain themselves, leading to major developments in modern logic and the axiomatization of set theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cantor’s Dilemma Target entity description: Cantor’s Dilemma is a science-in-fiction novel by chemist and author Carl Djerassi that explores the ethical and personal tensions surrounding scientific research and priority in discovery.
-
A.
Cantor’s paradox
Cantor’s paradox is a foundational result in set theory showing that the “set of all sets” cannot exist because its power set would have a strictly larger cardinality, leading to a contradiction.
-
B.
Satan, Cantor, and Infinity
"Satan, Cantor, and Infinity" is a popular logic and mathematics book by Raymond Smullyan that presents puzzles and paradoxes through playful dialogues and stories.
-
C.
Paradoxes of the Infinite
Paradoxes of the Infinite is a foundational 19th-century work in the philosophy of mathematics that systematically explores the nature of infinity and anticipates key ideas of modern set theory.
-
D.
Cantor’s theorem
Cantor’s theorem is a fundamental result in set theory stating that the power set of any set has a strictly greater cardinality than the set itself, implying there is no largest infinity.
-
E.
Russell’s paradox
Russell’s paradox is a foundational logical contradiction in naive set theory that reveals problems with sets that contain themselves, leading to major developments in modern logic and the axiomatization of set theory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4cf87c8190a1ff474daec326b7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1582d8e548190a7330de49d519675 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:45 p.m.