Triple

T22382130
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject U(1) E553299 entity
Predicate hasChargeQuantizationLabeledBy P147445 FINISHED
Object integers in many models LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: integers in many models | Statement: [U(1), hasChargeQuantizationLabeledBy, integers in many models]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChargeQuantizationLabeledBy
Context triple: [U(1), hasChargeQuantizationLabeledBy, integers in many models]
  • A. hasChargeConjugation
    Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
  • B. hasCharge
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific electrical or formal charge, such as positive, negative, or neutral.
  • C. hasChargeColor
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a particular color used to represent its electric charge or charge state.
  • D. isQuantumOf
    Indicates that one entity represents a discrete, indivisible unit or packet of the other entity in a quantized relationship.
  • E. isColorCharged
    Indicates that an entity possesses color charge, meaning it carries the type of charge associated with the strong nuclear interaction in quantum chromodynamics.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e4c03248190a26a5060ea6973ee completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1582cce608190b5324b30f349a3ff completed April 29, 2026, 1 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e73015484c8190a9a0b9f554b61a81 completed April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e73597b51c8190aeff27f4779b82f3 completed April 21, 2026, 8:30 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:45 p.m.