Triple
T22374762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stylus |
E553124
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsSyntaxStyle |
P25612
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indented syntax |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: indented syntax | Statement: [Stylus, supportsSyntaxStyle, indented syntax]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsSyntaxStyle Context triple: [Stylus, supportsSyntaxStyle, indented syntax]
-
A.
supportsStyleDefinition
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, recognizing, or working with a particular style definition associated with another entity.
-
B.
supportsMarkupStyle
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, rendering, or otherwise working with a specified markup style associated with another entity.
-
C.
supportsCommentsStyle
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling or displaying comments in a particular style or formatting convention.
-
D.
syntaxStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic or structural conventions used in the form or arrangement of an expression, statement, or code.
-
E.
supportsLanguageMode
Indicates that one entity provides or is compatible with a particular language mode used or required by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4c03248190a26a5060ea6973ee |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f15806b534819083716c2b090ede42 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e73011e6388190a05edf137f488441 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:45 p.m.