Triple
T22364490
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Perfecto Mix |
E552864
|
entity |
| Predicate | remixStyle |
P147375
|
FINISHED |
| Object | club-oriented |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: club-oriented | Statement: [The Perfecto Mix, remixStyle, club-oriented]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: remixStyle Context triple: [The Perfecto Mix, remixStyle, club-oriented]
-
A.
remixFeatures
Indicates that one entity is a modified or reworked version of another, incorporating or altering features from the original.
-
B.
remixContribution
Indicates that one entity has contributed to the creation, modification, or reinterpretation of another entity in the context of a remix.
-
C.
isRemixWith
Indicates that one creative work is a remix created in collaboration with, or incorporating elements from, another specific work.
-
D.
remixTeam
Indicates that one entity is a team responsible for creating, modifying, or collaborating on a remix of another entity (such as a work, project, or artifact).
-
E.
remixArtist
Indicates that one entity is the artist who created a remix version of a work originally produced by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e4affcc8190ba7c27d29062558d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f157ffba088190ae455508eb6c2a9c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e73011e6388190a05edf137f488441 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:06 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7342e9a0081909257210a81c96b29 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:44 p.m.