Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Miller v. California | Statement: [Roth test for obscenity, partiallyOverruledBy, Miller v. California]

Target entity: Miller v. California
Context triple: [Roth test for obscenity, partiallyOverruledBy, Miller v. California]

• A. Miller v. California chosen
  Miller v. California is a landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined the legal test for obscenity and allowed greater regulation of pornographic materials.
• B. Edwards v. California
  Edwards v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a California law restricting the bringing of indigent persons into the state, holding that such limits on interstate movement violated the Commerce Clause.
• C. Bridges v. California
  Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
• D. Gilbert v. California
  Gilbert v. California is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a defendant’s post-indictment lineup identification without counsel present violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
• E. Whitney v. California
  Whitney v. California was a 1927 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a conviction under a state criminal syndicalism law and became historically significant for Justice Brandeis’s influential concurrence on free speech before later being overruled.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: partiallyOverruledBy
Context triple: [Roth test for obscenity, partiallyOverruledBy, Miller v. California]

• A. overturnedInPartBy chosen
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or outcome has been partially reversed or modified by a later authority or action.
• B. overruledByStatute
  Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or principle has been superseded or invalidated by a later-enacted statute.
• C. concurrenceInPartAndDissentInPartBy
  Indicates that one party agrees with part of a decision or opinion and disagrees with another part, in relation to another party’s position.
• D. partiallyAbolishedBy
  Indicates that the existence or effect of one entity is reduced or limited, but not completely eliminated, by another entity.
• E. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• F. None of above.